I would not bump the KRyo version easily - the serialization format changed (that's why they have a new major version), which would render all Flink savepoints and checkpoints incompatible.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Luis, > > there is already an issue for bumping up the kryo version ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3154). You could open a PR if > you like. > > Timo > > Am 27/09/16 um 13:10 schrieb Luis Mariano Guerra: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Luis Mariano Guerra < > mari...@event-fabric.com> wrote: > >> hi, I created an issue at kryo with a simple project that reproduces the >> problem, but still asking here in case anyone knows a solution: >> >> https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo/issues/462 >> > > I found a solution to the problem, it's an extra if in Kryo that solves > the problem and can be applied to 2.24.0, so if they accept a PR flink can > move to 2.24.1 and not 4.0.0 :) (still the tweet I mention may be a good > reason to move to 3.0.4) > > >> >> >> basically, I get an error trying to serialize a simple tree like >> structure, the error happens with a 2 node, 1 leaf tree so it's not a >> recursion problem caused by the size of the data. >> >> anyone knows a way to avoid this error? >> >> also, in the repo I tried with the 3 latest stable versions of kryo >> (2.24.0, 3.0.3 an 4.0.0) and 4.0.0 seems to fix it, I tried building flink >> and testing the update and with 3.0.3 it seems to work, but the build fails >> for 4.0.0, didn't looked much into details since I hadn't much time. >> >> I think at least moving to 3.0.3 would be a good thing in case this is >> true: https://twitter.com/novoj/status/780693354610880514 >> >> > > > -- > Freundliche Grüße / Kind Regards > > Timo Walther > > Follow me: @twalthrhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/twalthr > >
