Hi Kostas, Thanks for the reply, makes things a bit more clear.
Also, I went through this link and it is something similar I am trying to observe. http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Listening-to-timed-out-patterns-in-Flink-CEP-td9371.html I am checking for timed out events and when I am using event time, its behaviour is non-deterministic. For one pattern it's generating a few 'matched events' and for a different pattern no 'matched events'. And almost no timedout events in any of the patterns unless I run the series of mock events a second time, during which I get a series of anomaly events. I had a topic created with this issue but I didn't get any satisfactory solutions there, so was testing it with processing time whether it works even or not. https://gist.github.com/revolutionisme/cf675ceee1492b93be020d4526bc9d38 https://gist.github.com/revolutionisme/38578e631f7a15f02cb2488f9fe56c76 I would really like to know how to increment the watermark without any events coming in, such that at least the timedout events are emitted by the system. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Flink-CEP-not-emitting-timed-out-events-properly-tp13794p13800.html Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
