Hi ,
You've got a point. I saw that method, but how can I make sure that all
the subtasks checkpoint are finished, because I can only write _SUCCESS file at
that time.
Best,
Ben
> On 5 Feb 2018, at 6:34 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In case of a failure, Flink rolls back the job to the last checkpoint and
> reprocesses all data since that checkpoint.
> Also the BucketingSink will truncate a file to the position of the last
> checkpoint if the file system supports truncate. If not, it writes a file
> with the valid length and starts a new file.
>
> Therefore, all files that the BucketingSink finishes must be treated as
> volatile until the next checkpoint is completed.
> Only when a checkpoint is completed a finalized file may be read. The files
> are renamed on checkpoint to signal that they are final and can be read. This
> would also be the right time to generate a _SUCCESS file.
> Have a look at the BucketingSink.notifyCheckpointComplete() method.
>
> Best, Fabian
>
>
>
>
> 2018-02-05 6:43 GMT+01:00 xiaobin yan <yan.xiao.bin.m...@gmail.com
> <mailto:yan.xiao.bin.m...@gmail.com>>:
> Hi ,
>
> I have tested it. There are some small problems. When checkpoint is
> finished, the name of the file will change, and the success file will be
> written before checkpoint.
>
> Best,
> Ben
>
>
>> On 1 Feb 2018, at 8:06 PM, Kien Truong <duckientru...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:duckientru...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did not actually test this, but I think with Flink 1.4 you can extend
>> BucketingSink and overwrite the invoke method to access the watermark
>> Pseudo code:
>> invoke(IN value, SinkFunction.Context context) {
>> long currentWatermark = context.watermark()
>> long taskIndex = getRuntimeContext().getIndexOfThisSubtask()
>> if (taskIndex == 0 && currentWatermark - lastSuccessWatermark > 1 hour) {
>> Write _SUCCESS
>> lastSuccessWatermark = currentWatermark round down to 1 hour
>> }
>> invoke(value)
>> }
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kien
>> On 1/31/2018 5:54 PM, xiaobin yan wrote:
>>> Hi:
>>>
>>> I think so too! But I have a question that when should I add this logic in
>>> BucketingSink! And who does this logic, and ensures that the logic is
>>> executed only once, not every parallel instance of the sink that executes
>>> this logic!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Ben
>>>
>>>> On 31 Jan 2018, at 5:58 PM, Hung <unicorn.bana...@gmail.com>
>>>> <mailto:unicorn.bana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> it depends on how you partition your file. in my case I write file per
>>>> hour,
>>>> so I'm sure that file is ready after that hour period, in processing time.
>>>> Here, read to be ready means this file contains all the data in that hour
>>>> period.
>>>>
>>>> If the downstream runs in a batch way, you may want to ensure the file is
>>>> ready.
>>>> In this case, ready to read can mean all the data before watermark as
>>>> arrived.
>>>> You could take the BucketingSink and implement this logic there, maybe wait
>>>> until watermark
>>>> reaches
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Sendoh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from:
>>>> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/
>>>> <http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/>
>
>
