Hi Fabian,

It does not since my events are out of order within a certain interval and
removing allowedLateness reduces the elements processed with 99.5%.
Is it possible to trigger the window first when the allowed latness value
has been passed?


Regards
Björn Zachrisson

On 16 February 2018 at 12:17, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Björn,
>
> You configured an allowed lateness, so this might be caused by late
> arriving data.
> In case a late record is received within the allowed lateness, the window
> function will fire again for the same window.
> Does that also happen if you remove the allowedLateness() call?
>
> Best, Fabian
>
>
> 2018-02-16 12:05 GMT+01:00 Björn Zachrisson <bjo...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have something weird probably a user error :)
>>
>> I'm running a keyby on multiple elements
>>
>> val keyedStream = nonKeyedStream
>>   .keyBy(m => (m.1, m.2, m.3.getOrElse(-1), m.4))
>>
>> then apply a window function
>>
>> val appliedWindow = keyedStream
>>   .timeWindow(minutes(WindowTimeMinutes))
>>   .allowedLateness(minutes(WindowDelayMinutes))
>>   .apply(new windowFunc1)
>>
>>
>> This is my first action in apply function
>>
>> override def apply(key: (Int,Long,Int,Int), window: TimeWindow, input: 
>> Iterable[T4], out: Collector[T4]): Unit = {
>>   myClass.addKey(key,window)
>>
>>
>> And in this class i have a function
>>
>> object myClass{
>>   val keyHash = new mutable.HashMap[(Int,Long,Int,Int),TimeWindow]()
>>
>>
>>   def addKey(key: (Int,Long,Int,Int), window : TimeWindow) : Unit = {
>>     if(keyHash.contains(key)){
>>       printf("Multiple key found for: " + key + "\n")
>>       printf(keyHash(key) + "\n")
>>       printf(window + "\n")
>>     }
>>     keyHash.put(key,window)
>>   }
>> }
>>
>>
>> This outputs
>> Multiple key found for: (1,2,3,4)
>> TimeWindow{start=1518268800000, end=1518270000000}
>> TimeWindow{start=1518268800000, end=1518270000000}
>>
>>
>> So it seems that the keyby is not doing what is is supposed to or I am
>> messing things up somewhere but I cannot seem to find it.
>>
>> Regards
>> Björn
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to