Yes you should be able to use Row instead of Tuple in your
BatchTableSink<T>.
There's sections in Flink documentation regarding mapping of data types to
table schemas [1]. and table can be converted into various typed DataStream
[2] as well. Hope these are helpful.

Thanks,
Rong

[1]
https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.6/dev/table/common.html#mapping-of-data-types-to-table-schema
[2]
https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.6/dev/table/common.html#convert-a-table-into-a-datastream-or-dataset



On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 8:04 AM françois lacombe <
francois.laco...@dcbrain.com> wrote:

> Hi Timo,
>
> Thanks for your answer
> I was looking for a Tuple as to feed a BatchTableSink<T> subclass, but it
> may be achived with a Row instead?
>
> All the best
>
> François
>
> 2018-08-24 10:21 GMT+02:00 Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> tuples are just a sub category of rows. Because the tuple arity is
>> limited to 25 fields. I think the easiest solution would be to write your
>> own converter that maps rows to tuples if you know that you will not need
>> more than 25 fields. Otherwise it might be easier to just use a
>> TextInputFormat and do the parsing yourself with a library.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Timo
>>
>>
>> Am 23.08.18 um 18:54 schrieb françois lacombe:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm looking for best practices regarding Tuple<T> instances creation.
>>>
>>> I have a TypeInformation object produced by
>>> AvroSchemaConverter.convertToTypeInfo("{...}");
>>> Is this possible to define a corresponding Tuple<T> instance with it?
>>> (get the T from the TypeInformation)
>>>
>>> Example :
>>> {
>>>   "type": "record",
>>>   "fields": [
>>>     { "name": "field1", "type": "int" },
>>>     { "name": "field2", "type": "string"}
>>> ]}
>>>  = Tuple2<Int,String>
>>>
>>> The same question rises with DataSet or other any record handling class
>>> with parametrized types.
>>>
>>> My goal is to parse several CsvFiles with different structures described
>>> in an Avro schema.
>>> It would be great to not hard-code structures in my Java code and only
>>> get types information at runtime from Avro schemas
>>>
>>> Is this possible?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> François Lacombe
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to