Hi, The problem is that Flink SQL does not expose the UIDs of the generated operators. We've met that issue before, but it is still not fully clear what would be the best way to this accessible.
Best, Fabian 2018-09-13 5:15 GMT-04:00 Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org>: > Hi Oleksandr, > > The mapping of state to operator is done based on operator id, not on its > name. That's why changing source's name might not be enough. > > That actually might be a valuable addition to check if the restored > partitions still match with the provided topic/topic pattern. Would you > like to open jira ticket for it? > > Best, > > Dawid > > On 13/09/18 11:06, Oleksandr Nitavskyi wrote: > > Hello Dawid, > > > > Thank you for the answer. In our case we did change the name of the Kafka > source so we expected it shouldn’t restore state for a given Kafka source > operator. > > > > Anyway shouldn’t FlinkKafkaConsumerBase have a safeguard which do not > allow restoring of the KafkaTopicPartitions from the topics which are > different from the currently consumed one. > > > > Thank you > > Oleksandr > > > > *From: *Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org> <dwysakow...@apache.org> > *Date: *Thursday, 13 September 2018 at 09:59 > *To: *Juan Gentile <j.gent...@criteo.com> <j.gent...@criteo.com>, > "user@flink.apache.org" <user@flink.apache.org> <user@flink.apache.org> > <user@flink.apache.org> > *Cc: *R&D/Product Engineering/PRIME/Delight <deli...@criteo.com> > <deli...@criteo.com>, <gor...@data-artisans.com> > <gor...@data-artisans.com> > *Subject: *Re: Weird behaviour after change sources in a job. > > > > Hi Juan, > > I think this is somehow expected behaviour. Flink, in order to provide > proper processing semantics keeps track of partitions offsets internally, > and checkpoints those offsets. FlinkKafkaConsumer supports > > also new partitions discovery. Having in mind both of those features, if > you restart your job with savepoint/checkpoint but with changed topic, it > will restore old partitions with offsets from checkpoint, and will discover > partitions > > from the new topic. This is why it consumes from both old and new topic. > If you defined your source manually (you were not using > Kafka010TableSource) what you can do is set new uid for the source and > enable allowNonRestoredState. This way you will keep state for all other > operators, but you will lose > > information about offsets in Kafka. > > > > I also cc @Gordon, who might want to add something to this. > > > > On 12/09/18 18:03, Juan Gentile wrote: > > Hello! > > > > We have found a weird issue while replacing the source in one of our Flink > SQL Jobs. > > > > We have a job which was reading from a Kafka topic (with externalize > checkpoints) and we needed to change the topic while keeping the same logic > for the job/SQL. > > After we restarted the job, instead of consuming from the new Kafka topic, > it consumed from both! Duplicating the input of our job. > > We were able to reproduce the issue but we don’t understand if this is a > bug or expected behavior and in this case we should have restarted from a > clean state. > > We are using Flink 1.4 at the moment and Kafka 0.10.2.1 > > > > Thank you, > > Juan > > > > >
