Hi Till,

I also believe that it's a problem with a single mirror. It was not a
blocking problem for me; I just wanted you to be aware of it, in case you
have some policy regarding the management of mirrors.

Best,
Gianluca


On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 14:27, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Gianluca,
>
> I've downloaded flink-1.6.1-bin-scala_2.11.tgz from here [1] and verified
> that the shasum512 and the signature are both correct.
>
> The only way I could explain this is that either your downloaded artifacts
> or the mirror you got the binaries from got corrupted.
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/flink-1.6.1/
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:07 PM Gianluca Ortelli <
> gianl...@mediadistillery.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Fabian,
>>
>> the mirror is
>> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/flink/flink-1.6.1/flink-1.6.1-bin-scala_2.11.tgz
>>
>> I just tried a download and the hash is still wrong: it should be
>>
>>
>> d0153bad859e3c2da7e73299837f95670279b3102a0982809f56eb61875908a10120e82bc2dca59972e912c0221cbbfd01f4cd1128a92dd37358e28fe1f76f2f
>>
>> but instead it's
>>
>>
>> 9b4ceb7ad59df27ea4c12d15845165dcf64675a26161d502d399234ae237f40f719ab6da4fac7ba210a20aa82364b5ac0377b06a1324e21516198b7a23b5d19c
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Gianluca
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 11:59, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gianluca,
>>>
>>> I tried to validate the issue but hash and signature are OK for me.
>>>
>>> Do you remember which mirror you used to download the binaries?
>>>
>>> Best, Fabian
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Sa., 29. Sep. 2018 um 17:24 Uhr schrieb vino yang <
>>> yanghua1...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Gianluca,
>>>>
>>>> This is very strange, Till may be able to give an explanation, because
>>>> it is the release manager of this version.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, vino.
>>>>
>>>> Gianluca Ortelli <gianl...@mediadistillery.com> 于2018年9月28日周五 下午4:02写道:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just downloaded flink-1.6.1-bin-scala_2.11.tgz from
>>>>> https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html and noticed that it fails
>>>>> signature verification with a
>>>>>
>>>>> gpg: BAD signature from "Till Rohrmann (stsffap) <trohrm...@apache.org
>>>>> >"
>>>>>
>>>>> message. The sha512 hash doesn't match either.
>>>>>
>>>>> I switched to 1.6.0, which verifies OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Gianluca
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to