Is the reason ValueState cannot be use because session windows are always
formed by merging proto-windows of single elements, therefore a state store
is needed that can handle merging. ValueState does not provide this
functionality, but a ReducingState does?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 4:01 PM Manas Kale <manaskal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Till,
> Thanks for your answer! You also answered the next question that I was
> about to ask "Can we share state between a Trigger and a Window?" Currently
> the only (convoluted) way to share state between two operators is through
> the broadcast state pattern, right?
> Also, in your example, why can't we use a ValueStateDescriptor<Boolean> in
> the Trigger? I tried using it in my own example but it  I am not able to
> call the mergePartitionedState() method on a ValueStateDescriptor.
>
> Regards,
> Manas
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:20 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Manas,
>>
>> you can implement something like this with a bit of trigger magic. What
>> you need to do is to define your own trigger implementation which keeps
>> state to remember whether it has triggered the "started window" message or
>> not. In the stateful window function you would need to do something
>> similar. The first call could trigger the output of "window started" and
>> any subsequent call will trigger the evaluation of the window. It would
>> have been a bit easier if the trigger and the window process function could
>> share its internal state. Unfortunately, this is not possible at the moment.
>>
>> I've drafted a potential solution which you can find here [1].
>>
>> [1] https://gist.github.com/tillrohrmann/5251f6d62e256b60947eea7b553519ef
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 8:09 AM Manas Kale <manaskal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I want to achieve the following using event time session windows:
>>>
>>>    1. When the window.getStart() and last event timestamp in the window
>>>    is greater than MIN_WINDOW_SIZE milliseconds, I want to emit a message
>>>    "Window started @ timestamp".
>>>    2. When the session window ends, i.e. the watermark passes
>>>    lasteventTimestamp + inactivityPeriod, I want to emit a message "Window
>>>    ended @ timestamp".
>>>
>>>  It is guaranteed that all events are on time and no lateness is
>>> allowed. I am having difficulty implementing both 1 and 2 simultaneously.
>>> I am able to implement point 1 using a custom trigger, which checks if
>>> (lastEventTimestamp - window.getStart()) > MIN_WINDOW_SIZE and triggers a
>>> customProcessWindowFunction().
>>> However, with this architecture I can't detect the end of the window.
>>>
>>> Is my approach correct or is there a completely different method to
>>> achieve this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Manas Kale
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to