I think you are misunderstanding a few things.

a) when you include a variable in the scope format, then Flink fills that in /before/ it reaches Datadog. If you set it to "flink.<job_name>", then what we send to Datadog is "flink.myAwesomeJob". b) the exception you see is not coming from Datadog. They occur because, based on the configured scope formats, metrics from different jobs running in the same JobManager resolve to the same name (the standby jobmanger is irrelevant). Flink rejects these metrics, because if were to send these out you'd get funny results in Datadog because all jobs would try to report the same metric.

In short, you need to include the job id or job name in the metrics.scope.jm.job scope formats.

On 13/10/2021 06:39, Clemens Valiente wrote:
Hi,

we are using datadog as our metrics reporter as documented here:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/deployment/metric_reporters/#datadog

our jobmanager scope is
metrics.scope.jm <http://metrics.scope.jm>: flink.jobmanager
    metrics.scope.jm.job: flink.jobmanager
since datadog doesn't allow placeholder in metric names, we cannot include the <host> or <job_name> placeholder in the scope.

This setup worked nicely on our standalone kubernetes application deployment without using HA. But when we set up HA, we lost checkpointing metrics in datadog, and see this warning in the jobmanager log:
2021-10-01 04:22:09,920 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'totalNumberOfCheckpoints'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, jobmanager]
2021-10-01 04:22:09,920 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'numberOfInProgressCheckpoints'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, 
jobmanager]
2021-10-01 04:22:09,920 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'numberOfCompletedCheckpoints'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, 
jobmanager]
2021-10-01 04:22:09,921 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'numberOfFailedCheckpoints'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, jobmanager]
2021-10-01 04:22:09,921 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'lastCheckpointRestoreTimestamp'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, 
jobmanager]
2021-10-01 04:22:09,921 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'lastCheckpointSize'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, jobmanager]
2021-10-01 04:22:09,921 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'lastCheckpointDuration'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, jobmanager]
2021-10-01 04:22:09,921 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'lastCheckpointProcessedData'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, 
jobmanager]
2021-10-01 04:22:09,921 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'lastCheckpointPersistedData'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, 
jobmanager]
2021-10-01 04:22:09,921 WARN  org.apache.flink.metrics.MetricGroup              
           [] - Name collision: Group already contains a Metric with the 
name'lastCheckpointExternalPath'. Metric will not be reported.[flink, 
jobmanager]

I assume this is because we now have two jobmanager pods (one active one standby) and they both report this metric, it fails. but we cannot use the <host> scope in the group, otherwise we won't be able to build datadog dashboards conveniently.

My question:
- did anyone else encounter this problem?
- how could we solve this to have checkpointing metrics again in HA mode without needing the <host> placeholder?

Thanks a lot
Clemens


By communicating with Grab Inc and/or its subsidiaries, associate companies and jointly controlled entities (“Grab Group”), you are deemed to have consented to the processing of your personal data as set out in the Privacy Notice which can be viewed at https://grab.com/privacy/

This email contains confidential information and is only for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not disseminate, distribute or copy this email Please notify Grab Group immediately if you have received this by mistake and delete this email from your system. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as any information therein could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, delayed or incomplete, or contain viruses. Grab Group do not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this email arises as a result of email transmission. All intellectual property rights in this email and attachments therein shall remain vested in Grab Group, unless otherwise provided by law.

Reply via email to