Hi all, Just wanted to follow up on this again :) Thanks in advance.
Regards, Mac Pandey On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:59 PM Makhanchan Pandey < makhanchanpan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > For Flink to treat a model class as a special POJO type, these are the > documented conditions: > https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-release-1.13/docs/dev/serialization/types_serialization/#pojos > > It says the following: > > - > > All fields are either public or must be accessible through getter and > setter functions. For a field called foo the getter and setter methods > must be named getFoo() and setFoo(). > > > We have boolean fields in our model class: > public class Input { > private boolean open; > } > > As per this we are forced to create an accessor getOpen( ) while the > standard Javabeans convention would be isOpen(). > > We ran some tests with both isOpen and getOpen and both seem to be > recognized as POJO. > > Could we get confirmation that using isOpen() is valid here? And that this > primitive boolean case is just not been documented in the above link? > > > Regards, > Mac Pandey > > > > > > >
