Hi,
Flink SQL follows the standard SQL, so I think SQL syntax will be richer
and richer in higher versions, it will not be changed.

Best,
Ron

liu ron <ron9....@gmail.com> 于2023年4月13日周四 10:24写道:

> Hi,
> Flink SQL follows the standard SQL, so I think SQL syntax will be richer
> and richer in higher versions, it will not be changed.
>
> Best,
> Ron
>
> Shammon FY <zjur...@gmail.com> 于2023年4月13日周四 09:57写道:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Currently, Calcite supports standard SQL, so I think the main SQL syntax
>> will remain unchanged or backward compatible even when Flink upgrades its
>> calcite version. You can refer to it.
>>
>> Best,
>> Shammon FY
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 12:00 PM ravi_suryavanshi.yahoo.com via user <
>> user@flink.apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> we have decided to use the Table API using Flink SQL syntax (NOT JAVA).
>>> Can SQL syntax be changed in the higher version?
>>> as per the doc "SQL support is based on Apache Calcite
>>> <https://calcite.apache.org/> which implements the SQL standard."
>>>
>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>> Ravi
>>> On Saturday, 25 March, 2023 at 06:21:49 pm IST, Mate Czagany <
>>> czmat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please also keep in mind that restoring existing Table API jobs from
>>> savepoints when upgrading to a newer minor version of Flink, e.g. 1.16 ->
>>> 1.17 is not supported as the topology might change between these versions
>>> due to optimizer changes.
>>>
>>> See here for more information:
>>> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/dev/table/concepts/overview/#stateful-upgrades-and-evolution
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mate
>>>
>>> Hang Ruan <ruanhang1...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2023. márc. 25.,
>>> Szo, 13:38):
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think the SQL job is better. Flink SQL jobs can be easily shared with
>>> others for debugging. And it is more suitable for flow batch integration.
>>> For a small part of jobs which can not be expressed through SQL, we will
>>> choose a job by DataStream API.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Hang
>>>
>>> ravi_suryavanshi.yahoo.com via user <user@flink.apache.org>
>>> 于2023年3月24日周五 17:25写道:
>>>
>>> Hello Team,
>>> Need your advice on which method is recommended considering don't want
>>> to change my query code when the Flink is updated/upgraded to the higher
>>> version.
>>>
>>> Here I am seeking advice for writing the SQL using java code(Table API
>>> function and Expression) or using pure SQL.
>>>
>>> I am assuming that SQL will not have any impact if upgraded to the
>>> higher version.
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>> Ravi
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to