+1, the fallback looks weird now, it is outdated.

But, it is good to provide an option. I don't know if there are some
users who depend on this fallback.

Best,
Jingsong

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 1:47 PM Rui Li <lirui.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1, the fallback was just intended as a temporary workaround to run 
> catalog/module related statements with hive dialect.
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 3:59 PM Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Big +1 on this, thanks yuxia for driving this!
>>
>> yuxia <luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn> 于2023年5月29日周一 14:55写道:
>>
>> > Hi, community.
>> >
>> > I want to start the discussion about Hive dialect shouldn't fall back to
>> > Flink's default dialect.
>> >
>> > Currently, when the HiveParser fail to parse the sql in Hive dialect,
>> > it'll fall back to Flink's default parser[1] to handle flink-specific
>> > statements like "CREATE CATALOG xx with (xx);".
>> >
>> > As I‘m involving with Hive dialect and have some communication with
>> > community users who use Hive dialectrecently,  I'm thinking throw exception
>> > directly instead of falling back to Flink's default dialect when fail to
>> > parse the sql in Hive dialect
>> >
>> > Here're some reasons:
>> >
>> > First of all, it'll hide some error with Hive dialect. For example, we
>> > found we can't use Hive dialect any more with Flink sql client in release
>> > validation phase[2], finally we find a modification in Flink sql client
>> > cause it, but our test case can't find it earlier for although HiveParser
>> > faill to parse it but then it'll fall back to default parser and pass test
>> > case successfully.
>> >
>> > Second, conceptually, Hive dialect should be do nothing with Flink's
>> > default dialect. They are two totally different dialect. If we do need a
>> > dialect mixing Hive dialect and default dialect , may be we need to propose
>> > a new hybrid dialect and announce the hybrid behavior to users.
>> > Also, It made some users confused for the fallback behavior. The fact
>> > comes from I had been ask by community users. Throw an excpetioin directly
>> > when fail to parse the sql statement in Hive dialect will be more 
>> > intuitive.
>> >
>> > Last but not least, it's import to decouple Hive with Flink planner[3]
>> > before we can externalize Hive connector[4]. If we still fall back to Flink
>> > default dialct, then we will need depend on `ParserImpl` in Flink planner,
>> > which will block us removing the provided dependency of Hive dialect as
>> > well as externalizing Hive connector.
>> >
>> > Although we hadn't announced the fall back behavior ever, but some users
>> > may implicitly depend on this behavior in theirs sql jobs. So, I hereby
>> > open the dicussion about abandoning the fall back behavior to make Hive
>> > dialect clear and isoloted.
>> > Please remember it won't break the Hive synatax but the syntax specified
>> > to Flink may fail after then. But for the failed sql, you can use `SET
>> > table.sql-dialect=default;` to switch to Flink dialect.
>> > If there's some flink-specific statements we found should be included in
>> > Hive dialect to be easy to use, I think we can still add them as specific
>> > cases to Hive dialect.
>> >
>> > Look forwards to your feedback. I'd love to listen the feedback from
>> > community to take the next steps.
>> >
>> > [1]:
>> > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/678370b18e1b6c4a23e5ce08f8efd05675a0cc17/flink-connectors/flink-connector-hive/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/table/planner/delegation/hive/HiveParser.java#L348
>> > [2]:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26681
>> > [3]:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31413
>> > [4]:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30064
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Yuxia
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best,
>> Benchao Li
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards!
> Rui Li

Reply via email to