Thanks for the proposal. +1 from my side and +1 for putting them to a separate section.
Best, Hang Samrat Deb <decordea...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 15:32写道： > Thanks for the proposal , > +1 for adding deprecated identifier > > [Thought] Can we have seperate section / page for deprecated configs ? Wdut > ? > > > Bests, > Samrat > > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 3:44 PM, Alexander Fedulov < > alexander.fedu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Zhanghao, > > > > Thanks for the proposition. > > In general +1, this sounds like a good idea as long it is clear that the > > usage of these settings is discouraged. > > Just one minor concern - the configuration page is already very long, do > > you have a rough estimate of how many more options would be added with > this > > change? > > > > Best, > > Alexander Fedulov > > > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 18:24, Matthias Pohl <matthias.p...@aiven.io > > .invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for your proposal, Zhanghao Chen. I think it adds more > > transparency > > > to the configuration documentation. > > > > > > +1 from my side on the proposal > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 2:09 PM Zhanghao Chen < > zhanghao.c...@outlook.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Flink users and developers, > > > > > > > > Currently, Flink won't generate doc for the deprecated options. This > > > might > > > > confuse users when upgrading from an older version of Flink: they > have > > to > > > > either carefully read the release notes or check the source code for > > > > upgrade guidance on deprecated options. > > > > > > > > I propose to document deprecated options as well, with a > "(deprecated)" > > > > tag placed at the beginning of the option description to highlight > the > > > > deprecation status [1]. > > > > > > > > Looking forward to your feedbacks on it. > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33240 > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Zhanghao Chen > > > > > > > > > >
