It would require a separate one, but given one, it isn't hard to create the other.
- Bruce On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:32 PM, DeCarlo, Thom <[email protected]> wrote: > I had assumed that logback would need a different appender, though I don't > really know the internals of either library well enough to be certain. > > -- > Thom DeCarlo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brock Noland [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 9:18 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Logback appender for flume? > > Hi, > > Both of those tickets are for Flume OG (release series 0.9.X) where as > the community is moving forward with Flume NG (1.X). FlumeNG has a > log4j appender: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-886 and > http://flume.apache.org/FlumeUserGuide.html#log4j-appender > > Would logback require a separate appender? > > Brock > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:09 AM, DeCarlo, Thom <[email protected]> wrote: > > I haven't been able to find any recent comments about a logback appender > for Flume. There is a log4j appender, as noted in [FLUME-27], but the > similar request that specifically mentions logback [FLUME-524] seems to > have been withdrawn. > > > > However, I am already using logback and cannot easily change that. Has > there been any development of a logback appender? > > > > -- > > Thom DeCarlo > > > > > > -- > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - > http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/ >
