Hi,
I did a simple test about exec source, and found it didn't flush the last data. Here's the steps: *a. create the source file 1.test, which has sequence number from 1 to 15, like this:*
    ----------
          1
          2
         ...
          15
   ----------
*b. create the configure file flume_simple.conf like this:*
-------------------------
       a1.sources = r1
a1.channels = c1
a1.sinks = k1

a1.sources.r1.type = exec
a1.sources.r1.command = tail -n +0 -F /opt/scripts/tvhadoop/flume/flume-1.3.0/source/1.test
a1.sources.r1.channels = c1
a1.sources.r1.batchSize = 10

a1.channels.c1.type = memory

a1.sinks.k1.type = file_roll
a1.sinks.k1.channel = c1
a1.sinks.k1.sink.directory = /opt/scripts/tvhadoop/flume/flume-1.3.0/sink
---------------------
*c. run flume with command: *
bin/flume-ng agent --conf conf -f conf/flume_simple.conf -Dflume.root.logger=DEBUG,console -n a1

After more than 1 minute(file roll interval), I check the output directory, there are 2 files, one has number from 1 to 10, and the other has nothing. *I think this is because the batchSize was set to 10, the the last 5 numbers didn't get flushed and lost.* Even I apply the patch in 'https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1819', nothing changed. If I debug into the code, *I found the red codes outside while clause never get executed*.
       ----------------
          while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
            counterGroup.incrementAndGet("exec.lines.read");
            eventList.add(EventBuilder.withBody(line.getBytes()));
            if(eventList.size() >= bufferCount) {
              channelProcessor.processEventBatch(eventList);
              eventList.clear();
            }
          }
if(!eventList.isEmpty()) {
            channelProcessor.processEventBatch(eventList);
          }
       --------------
In my scenario, the source log files are divided by hour, so I need to change the file name in flume configure file. Because of the above bug, I can only set the batchsize of execSource to 1, which significantly slowdown the through pass. I wonder how to solve this problem. Any suggestions are most welcomed.
Best Regards,
larry



Reply via email to