+1 I believe that dropping Hadoop 1 support is completely fair at this point. Hadoop 2 is stable for a long time and offers much better capabilities. People who remain on Hadoop 1 will still have ability to download older Flume releases that are Hadoop 1 compatible.
Jarcec > On May 13, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Hari Shreedharan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Adding user@ > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Ashish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (speaking as dev, it keeps life a bit simple) >> >> Would wait for the users to give +1's as they get directly affected >> and possibly a few may have to upgrade Data Infrastructure. >> >> >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Hari Shreedharan >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Flume devs, >>> >>> With Flume moving away from Java 6 in Flume 1.7, I would like to start a >> discussion on whether we should completely drop Hadoop-1 support. I am not >> sure we can even link against Hadoop-1 if we build with Java 7 as the >> minimum requirement. Even if we can, I think it might be a good idea to >> drop Hadoop 1 support at this point. >>> >>> Comments? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Hari Shreedharan >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> thanks >> ashish >> >> Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog >> My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal >>
