Thank you all for the tips. Met vriendelijke groet, Ronald van de Kuil
> Op 15 apr. 2016 om 14:31 heeft Gonzalo Herreros <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > > I think so. > I hadn't considered kafka retention, however it might not have enough > precision for this purpose if you want accurate expiry dates > >> On 15 April 2016 at 13:27, Ronald van de Kuil <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> I see, so there could be a channel that is routed to if some header matches >> (the priority lane), and if there is a nomatch then it would route to the >> default channel. And if I would need more then I would need to make a code >> mod, right? >> >> >> 2016-04-15 13:54 GMT+02:00 Gonzalo Herreros <[email protected]>: >>> That would depend on the channel. >>> AFAIK, all the channels provided are FIFO without expiration but >>> technically you could implement a channel that does that. >>> >>> You could achieve some priority management using multiplexing. >>> >>> Gonzalo >>> >>>> On 15 April 2016 at 11:38, Ronald Van De Kuil >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Can anyone confirm my understanding that there is neither priority of >>>> flume events nor expiry of events in flume 1.6.0? >>>> >>>> I could not find it in Steve Hoffman's book nor in the user manual. >>>> >>>> If so, are there plans to add it in the future? >>>> >>>> Met vriendelijke groet, >>>> Ronald van de Kuil >
