Ross Gardler wrote: RG> It is a policy of the Forrest team to try not to break backward RG> compatibility.
Yes, I realized that from past messages in this forum. RG> Occasionally this is not possible. But usually it is. Exactly the reason I wanted to make sure. RG> In this case you could consider using the XHTML subset we have defined RG> now. We already support it as an input format, it's just that we don't RG> use it internally yet. This will save you having to retrain folk in the This sounds interesting. So this subset is currently transformed to document-vxx before it gets skinned. And it is probably not a plug-in (since I found none that looked like it) but a build-in feature. Only questions remaining is: Where is the grammar for this XHTML subset defined. I saw only the general xhtml-dtds in ...\main\webapp\resources\schema. Thanks, Ferdinand Soethe
