David Crossley wrote:
Maurice Lanselle wrote:
..
2) How does one construct "AND" classification rules?
<sourcetype name="foo">
<document-element local-name="foo"> && <document-element namespace="bar">
</sourcetype>
I don't know if that is possible or needed. Perhaps there is another way.
It would be better if you provided an actual use-case.
Using your example from earlier in this thread, AND would be:
> <sourcetype name="foo">
> <document-element local-name="foo">
> </sourcetype>
> <sourcetype name="bar">
> <document-element namespace="bar">
> </sourcetype>
> ...
> ...
> <map:when test="foo">
> <map:transform
> src="{project:resources.stylesheets}/foobar2document.xsl" />
> </map:when>
> <map:when test="bar">
> <map:transform
> src="{project:resources.stylesheets}/foobar2document.xsl" />
> </map:when>
> ...
i.e. test for each individual action and duplicate the transform code.
What duplicate code - that is bad (I herar you shout). You are of course
correct, so the sitemap provides a thing called resources to allow the
duplicate code to be refactored out and replaced with a
<map:call-resource...
(note the above example was directly copied for the suggestion for OR,
obviously in an OR you would have different actions within the test)
See the simplified-docbook plugins input.xmap file for an example of the
use of resources like this.
Ross
