El mié, 10-05-2006 a las 08:30 +0100, Ross Gardler escribió: > Gav... wrote: > > <quote who="David Crossley"> > > > >>Ross Gardler wrote: > >> > >>>Cameron McCormack wrote: > >>> > >>>>Hi David. > >>>> > >>>>David Crossley: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Not sure if this demo is in the Forrest-0.7 fresh site > >>>>>'forrest seed', but it is Forrest-0.8-dev and you can see > >>>>>it here: > >>>>>http://forrest.zones.apache.org/ft/build/forrest-seed/samples/linking.html#site-fragment > >>>> > >>>>Hmm, so you can only link to them by putting them in the site.xml file? > >>>>One for each ID in my documents? Maybe when the URIs are being > >>>>rewritten, the fragment ID should be stripped off and appended to the > >>>>end of the generated URI. > >>> > >>>That would be good, but don't hold your breath. Patches welcome (and > >>>help available on the dev list). > >> > >>See a very old related issue: > >>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-95 > >> > >>-David > >> > > > > > > Just wondering about adding an extra match into the locationmap. > > > > Something like :- > > > > <match pattern="**#*"> > > <location src="{1}.xml#{2}" /> > > </match> > > > > I'm not sure of the correct syntax at this stage, just wanted to throw the > > idea in. > > > > All works fine if we use a normal URL, but if we use the "site:" > protocol as is requried here the fragement identifier gets lost. > Therefore, the above would make no difference I'm afraid.
Further I am pretty sure that will result in an error since AFAIR the lm is not aware of fragement identifier and would look for a file (!!!) called e.g. gav.xml#testing and obviously would not find such a file. On the other hand what would the lm would response? Since the "real" answer is an xpath expression to a certain subset of a document. The location map is only worrying about *locations* of files not within files. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler COO Spain Wyona Inc. - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
