Ross Gardler wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm not sure why the meta tags are left in the xdoc format. Perhaps a
debugging remnant. I suspect it would be safe to remove the relevant XSL
that produces these comments.
Please don't remove the meta-elements in these transformations as they
are needed for transporting a number of different pieces of info about
the source document from source to final html.
These are commented out meta-element in the XDoc, they are not the
actual meta-elements. Please see the above comment in context for an
example.
Are you saying that the commented meta-elements are used anywhere? I am
not aware of such a thing, and if they are used I do not understand why
they are commented out.
Ross
I use this meta-elements for additional chapter-counters, so that I have
in my html-pages e.g. 2.5.x.x.x... and in the pdf too.
Therefore I add
<meta content="2.5" name="chapter">
to my .html
In site-to-xhtml.xsl I process this information e.g. for every section.
I know that is a dirty hack and it produces e.g. this
<h1>
<meta>
<meta>
<meta>
<meta>
<meta>
<meta>2.5.1. </meta>a new section ...</h1>
Which looks realy ugly :-( in code but the result in the browser is
looking good and that counts for our projects...
However this meta is not valid vor the DTD and hence - I think - it is
commented out. Although it gets processed (bug?).
Give me a better work-around than using meta and I will be happy (And
give me the time to implement that :-)))
Thomas
