True enough! I guess there's nothing preventing us from moving Geode to JDK 1.8 now.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Lyndon Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > Why do you need to wait until "customers move to 1.8" when geode is an > open source product? Surely customers are using a paid support version. Am > I missing something? > > Lyndon Adams > London, SW11 > > On 25 Jul 2015, at 07:33, Kirk Lund <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oi João, > > Our current source code level is Java 1.7. We just added 1.8 support > meaning that we build/compile the product under 1.7 JDK and then > test with both 1.7 and 1.8 JREs. > > We won't be able to drop 1.7 support until all customers move to 1.8 > (hopefully soon but probably not in 2015). > > -Kirk > > On Friday, July 24, 2015, João Peixoto <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks (obrigado ;) ) William. >> >> If I were to contribute to the project with a PR, which level should I >> respect? >> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:40 PM William Markito <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi João (Opa, tudo bem ?) >>> >>> Actually it's supposed to be Java 7 but there are areas that needs to be >>> updated. >>> >>> But you should be also fine to run and compile with Java 8. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> > On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:32 PM, João Peixoto <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I'm looking at the source code and I was wondering what is the >>> language level that Geode is aiming for. Currently it seems compatible with >>> Java 1.6, wondering if that minimum will be raised. >>> >>
