Hi All,

Curious about what everyone thinks about usage of Geode as a single process
rather than a full cluster. Before you respond to that alone, lets me
review why I would want to do this :-)

I like the Geode programming model for CRUD operations, function executions
and listeners. Its CacheWriter and Reader are also really useful. I find
the Client/Server approach really powerful, interests, client side
listeners and expiration provide some really powerful features for powerful
client applications.

So lets say I want all of this but don't need a distributed system (for a
smaller website lets say). I also don't want to mess with GFSH and making
any changes at the OS level. I just want something I can start.

I obvious thought was to use Redis, but I wanted to see if I could do
something with Geode as I am already pretty familiar with it.

As an experiment I built Spring Boot application with an embedded Locator
and Server (sample config below) that contains the Server config and any
dependancies my functions and listeners needed. Whats nice here is I have a
jar file I can copy somewhere, start up and be instantly ready for a client
to connect too. I have 4 clients and they get fast responses to Key/Value
operations, execute functions, receive interests, etc. I monitor it with
Monit.

Although I have not tried, I am pretty sure I can even run it on
run.pivotal.io.

Thoughts on this approach? Should I really just be using Redis for a single
cache?

Snippet from cache-config.xml

<util:properties id="singleCacheConfigurationSettings">

<prop key="name">singleCache</prop>

<prop key="locators">127.0.0.1[11235]</prop>

<prop key="log-level">config</prop>

<prop key="mcast-port">0</prop>

<prop key="start-locator">127.0.0.1[11235]</prop>

</util:properties>

<gfe:cache id="gemfireCache" pdx-serializer-ref="reflection-pdx-serializer"

properties-ref="singleCacheConfigurationSettings" />

<gfe:cache-server port="0" cache-ref="gemfireCache" />

Reply via email to