Processing a client queue is asynchronous to the client operations, but
adding to the queue is synchronous with them. So any client operation that
needs to access the full queue will be blocked waiting for space to become
available in it. That means any put operation from any client will block if
the client with the full queue cares about that event. Depending on your
client pool read-timeout, you could see client put operations timing out.

The processing of other client queues shouldn't be affected by this since
that processing is asynchronous from anything going on with the full queue.
My guess would be those client queues are empty and only sporadically
getting events added to them because a bunch of the putting threads are
blocked.

There is a property called remove-unresponsive-client (false by default)
that you can use to kick out the full client so that other client
operations are not affected.

You can also raise the cache-server maximum-message-count, but that will
probably just delay the issue.


Barry Oglesby
GemFire Advanced Customer Engineering (ACE)
For immediate support please contact Pivotal Support at
http://support.pivotal.io/


On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Eric Pederson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear all:
>
> I was tracking down an issue with a client that was receiving events late
> (receipt time minutes later than sending time) and started spuriously
> connecting/reconnecting to the server, ultimately losing some events.
>
> In the server log I saw this during the same time period:
>
> [warning 2015/10/13 16:28:48.551 EDT server-psclxfiprdsp104
> <ServerConnection on port 37386 Thread 696> tid=0x66b] Client queue for
> _gfe_non_durable_client_with_id_NYCWD28244(:loner):62826:929faf61_1_queue
> client is full.
>
>
>
> [info 2015/10/13 16:28:48.693 EDT server-psclxfiprdsp104 <ServerConnection
> on port 37386 Thread 696> tid=0x66b] Resuming with processing puts ...
>
>
> The client that was full was a different client from the one that was
> getting its events late.
>
>
> Is it possible that if a client is slow consuming its events (via CQ) and
> its server-side queue becomes full that other clients will be effected?  GC
> activity looked normal on that server during the time period.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Eric
>

Reply via email to