We have schema definitions, however these are still definitely subject to change. You can find them after a build collected in modules/assembly/target/geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT/schema/

I strongly encourage you to look into xdoclet2 since my experience with xdoclet 1 is that the templates quickly turn into an unmaintainable mess. I don't actually know that xdoclet2 is any better, but the developers claim it should be. I personally think that the "template" for xml descriptors should an annotated schema of the document you are trying to generate, the annotations consisting of queries against the model extracted from the javadoc tags.

thanks
david jencks

On Dec 3, 2004, at 9:21 AM, L. Yeung wrote:

Sounds interesting and I'm  willing give it a try. Are
there any geronimo tag specifications posted on the
page?

I'm just an intermediate Java developer, I'm not a
Java Guru or any PhD under my belt though.

Keep in touch.

-len

--- Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

L. Yeung wrote:
I'm relying on XDoclet heavily for my
SessionBeans.
I'ved checked out XDoclet's documentation but
there
seems no geronimo tags supported. I can't get any
more
information about this.

Hi,

I'm not at all surprised. I've seen no information
about XDoclet and
Geronimo working together, so it's time to have it.
What would you say
if you were invited to develop it? ;)

More information about configuration of Geronimo is
on Geronimo Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo. If it's not there,
it may certainly
mean that the requested feature doesn't exist yet.
And don't forget to
check out Geronimo JIRA as it may now be worked out.

len

Jacek




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com




Reply via email to