Hmm... Strange. You are correct. the archives for 2005 feb isn't visible on nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse. A couple of days ago I took the liberty of asking http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/ to archive geronimo-user list because it was not there even though geronimo-dev was. so it was added and you can find the 2005 feb archive over there.
strange, but it's there. sanjaya. ----- Original Message ----- From: "toby cabot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 1:39 AM Subject: Re: When can we expect geronimo 1.0? > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:58:32AM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > On May 12, 2005, at 6:25 PM, toby cabot wrote: > > > > >On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:24:55PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > >>You are right. Our website is awful. THanks for volunteering! :) > > >> > > > > > >The more the merrier, but please base your work on > > >http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-575 so we don't re-do > > >the same things. > > > > Cool! So this is just static to be applied directly? > > Yup. Here's some background: There was yet another "is Geronimo dead" > thread on this list back in February and people seemed to think that > the web site needed a freshening so I volunteered. Unfortunately, the > mailing list archive for February 2005 seems to have been lost so that > conversation isn't available anywhere. But I tried to respect the > consensus that came out of it and I think that my changes are pretty > benign. The biggest change is adding a lot of "we're not dead just > working on certification" verbiage. > > You can take a look at > http://www.caboteria.org/~tobyc/g6o-docs/ > > > I was thinking of tossing the maven site completely and starting from > > scratch with something simple. > > That's a good idea. One of the problems with the auto-generated site > is that a lot of the pages are "stubs" that don't have any useful > content but Maven doesn't know to *not* generate them. A few > hand-coded pages with lots of links to the wiki would probably be a > lot more user-friendly because there would be fewer "dead ends." > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - want a free and easy way to contact your friends online? http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
