I'm not sure exactly what you mean. If you don't want to use J2EE what are you looking for out of a container? If you don't want to use the built-in features, I'm not saying that Geronimo wouldn't fit, but you'd also want to look at e.g. XBean and Pico/Nano and so on. But perhaps you want to use the Geronimo DB pools and JMS features but not J2EE features. Can you give some more detail?
Thanks, Aaron On 5/26/06, Marcus Malcom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First off Geronimo is just looking fabulous - thanks! So, I would like to try and make Geronimo a one-stop solution for us, but the one thing that we're looking to do is to deploy non J2EE applications. In this case I'm interested in deploying "headless" J2SE applications. I've looked at the documentation for GBeans and this looks very promising, but I don't see much documentation/support for what I'm trying to do. So I guess my question is: am I trying to fit a square peg into a round hole here? If not, is there any documentation for this? Version: Geronimo 1.0 Thanks! -- Marcus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEd2ylCmHgPZZrHwIRAiGaAJ9HPGyi7GDDGiKzmAUSjQwhEzqALwCeJI1C tptBv62LCDhxx+IixbTxsk0= =gZdk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
