Could it be that the Derby database used for persistence is slowing
down the ActiveMQ server? Have you tried pointing ActiveMQ to a
different database for persistence (or leaving the journal but
disabling the database persistence)?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/22/06, avin98 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone noticed the performance of an Embedded ActiveMQ 3.2.2 to get
slower and slower as the AppServer uptime increases ?
I have been running my MDBs on geronimo 3.2.2 and I have noticed a
significant increase in the activeMQ performance, after restarting the
server everytime. The Message consumption is especially rocking fast.
I am able to tune it a bit, by not using XA transactions, but inspite of
that, the performance is pathetic in some case.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Geronimo-1.0-ActiveMQ-and-Performance-tf2319700.html#a6453842
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
