I am now using activemq instead of activemq-broker.

Does it matter what JVM I use?  I was originally using Java 5, but have 
reverted to the latest Java 1.4.2 release even though it seems to me I should 
be able to use newer JVMs.

The result of these two changes is that it is no longer complaining about the 
connection factory, but is giving me the very same error regarding the queue:


     Deployment failed:
Unable to resolve resource reference
'jms/myQueue' (Could not find resource 'SendReceiveQueue'. Perhaps it
has not yet been configured, or your application does not have a
dependency declared for that resource module?)

I guess I was wrong in my assessment that if I got the connection factory 
working, the queue would follow.  :-)  I have tried, at the suggestion of some 
web sites and messages on the list, to use <resource-env-ref> and 
<message-destination-link> instead of <resource-ref> and <resource-link> for 
the queue.  However, doing that just gives me an error at deployment time that 
I should use a <resource-ref>.

Here is my current geronimo-web.xml:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

  <dep:environment>
    <dep:moduleId>
      <dep:groupId>default</dep:groupId>
      <dep:artifactId>SimpleMDBWeb</dep:artifactId>
      <dep:version>1.0</dep:version>
      <dep:type>car</dep:type>
    </dep:moduleId>

    <dep:dependencies>
          <dep:dependency>
              <dep:artifactId>activemq</dep:artifactId>
              <dep:type>car</dep:type>
        </dep:dependency>
    </dep:dependencies>
  </dep:environment>

  <context-root>/SimpleMDBWeb</context-root>

  <nam:resource-ref>
    <nam:ref-name>jms/myConnFactoryRef</nam:ref-name>
    <nam:resource-link>DefaultActiveMQConnectionFactory</nam:resource-link>
  </nam:resource-ref>

  <nam:resource-ref>
    <nam:ref-name>jms/myQueue</nam:ref-name>
    <nam:resource-link>SendReceiveQueue</nam:resource-link>
  </nam:resource-ref>

</web-app>

I am following the other thread regarding a similar matter closely.

Thanks!
John

----- Original Message ----
From: Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:45:38 PM
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Reference/Dependencies

I think your dependency should be on activemq not activemq-broker.  If
I remember right, the activemq-broker module just configures the core
ActiveMQ broker and the activemq module has the basic connection
factories and stuff.

Thanks,
      Aaron

On 1/31/07, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen similar questions posted here which have helped me along to some 
> extent, but I've hit a dead end.
>
>
>
> I am trying to deploy a simple servlet which posts a message to a JMS queue.
>
>
>
> For the sake of simplicity in this message, I am only going to reference the 
> connection factory, as I assume once I figure out how to map that resource 
> properly, I can figure out the queue.
>
>
>
> The code does this:
>
>
>
> ConnectionFactory qConnectionFactory = 
> (ConnectionFactory)context.lookup("java:comp/env/jms/myConnFactoryRef");
>
>
>
> My web.xml has this:
>
>
>
>     <resource-ref>
>
>         <res-ref-name>jms/myConnFactoryRef</res-ref-name>
>
>          <res-type>javax.jms.ConnectionFactory</res-type>
>
>         <res-auth>Container</res-auth>
>
>     </resource-ref>
>
>
>
> My FULL geronimo-web.xml is as follows:
>
>
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>
> <web-app xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web-1.1";; 
> xmlns:nam="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming-1.1";;  
> xmlns:sec="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/security-1.1";;  
> xmlns:dep="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/deployment-1.1";;>
>
>   <dep:environment>
>
>      <dep:moduleId>
>
>       <dep:groupId>default</dep:groupId>
>
>       <dep:artifactId>SimpleMDBWeb</dep:artifactId>
>
>       <dep:version>1.0</dep:version>
>
>       <dep:type>car</dep:type>
>
>     </dep:moduleId>
>
>
>
>     <dep:dependencies>
>
>       <dep:dependency>
>
>           <dep:groupId>geronimo</dep:groupId>
>
>           <dep:artifactId>activemq-broker</dep:artifactId>
>
>           <dep:version>1.1.1</dep:version>
>
>           <dep:type>car</dep:type>
>
>       </dep:dependency>
>
>     </dep:dependencies>
>
>
>
>    </dep:environment>
>
>
>
>   <context-root>/SimpleMDBWeb</context-root>
>
>
>
>   <nam:resource-ref>
>
>     <nam:ref-name>jms/myConnFactoryRef</nam:ref-name>
>
>     <nam:resource-link>DefaultActiveMQConnectionFactory</nam:resource-link>
>
>   </nam:resource-ref>
>
>
>
>   <nam:resource-ref>
>
>     <nam:ref-name>jms/myQueue</nam:ref-name>
>
>     <nam:resource-link>SendReceiveQueue</nam:resource-link>
>
>   </nam:resource-ref>
>
>
>
> </web-app>
>
>
>
>
>
> The error I am getting is:
>
>
>
> "Unable to resolve resource reference 'jms/myConnFactoryRef' (Could not find 
> resource 'DefaultActiveMQConnectionFactory'.  Perhaps it has not yet been 
> configured, or your application does not have a dependency declared for that 
> resource module?)"
>
>
>
> It would seem from the error that the resource reference is properly linked 
> to the resource I want to use, but I am having a dependency issue.  I have 
> tried using "activemq" instead of "activemq-broker."  I have tried using 
> both.  I have tried creating my own JMS resource in Geronimo and referencing 
> that resource as a dependency instead of, and in addition to activemq and 
> activemq-broker.  No matter what I do, I get the above error.
>
>
>
> All the web pages and sample geronimo-web.xml files I have found seem to 
> support my usage above, but I am obviously still doing something wrong.
>
>
> I am using Geronimo 1.1.1.
>
>
>
> I would appreciate any pointer in the right direction.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
> Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
>





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
TV dinner still cooling? 
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to