Well, that sure did fix that in a hurry. Thank you.
Now, if I may, one final question. Now that my session bean is deployed,
aren't I supposed to be able to access it as web service through EJB? If
so, what do I need to do to make that happen?
Thank you again.
JP
djencks wrote:
>
> You need a geronimo plan for your (ejb? ear? app) that includes the
> jms module you have deployed as a parent, otherwise the references
> won't be able to be resolved.
>
> Also we ignore the mappedName, you should specify the name and make
> sure it's the same as what's in the jms module plan.
>
> Hope this helps
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Avorcor wrote:
>
>>
>> Okay, I tried to find a similar situation as this on this forum and
>> on the
>> web, but have not had any luck.
>>
>> I am using Geroimo 2.0M5
>>
>> I have deployed a new ActiveMQ Resource Adapter with 2 queues and 1
>> topic.
>> The factory name is Factory1
>>
>> I have a single session bean that publishes to a JMS queue. The
>> bean has
>> one method publishAsset(), which performs the publishing act to the
>> queue.
>>
>> This is a stateless session bean.
>>
>> it is declared with
>> @Stateless
>> @Remote( { AssetRecordRemote.class })
>>
>> I have a connection factory object declared in my code:
>>
>> @Resource(mappedName = "java:/comp/env/jms/Factory1")
>> ConnectionFactory
>> connectionFactory;
>>
>> The package this is in is called com.avorcor.fm
>> The bean name is AssetSessionBean
>>
>> I jar this up with my remote interface and call
>>
>> deploy AssetSessionBean.jar
>>
>> I get an error deploying:
>>
>> Error: Unable to distribute AssetSessionBean.jar:
>> org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Unable to resolve
>> resource reference
>> com.avorcor.fm.AssetSessionBean/connectionFactory'
>> (Could not auto-map to resource. Try adding a resource-ref
>> mapping
>> to your Geronimo deployment plan.
>>
>> If I remove all references to JMS, this will deploy just fine.
>> Although, it
>> deploys in the default package instead of com.avorcor.fm . I would
>> like to
>> hear thoughts on this as well if anyone knows, but my primary
>> concern is for
>> trying to understand why Geronimo cannot find the resource
>> reference and
>> what I could try to correct this situation.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-
>> resolve-resource-reference-on-3.0-with-annotations-
>> tf3919298s134.html#a11113134
>> Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-resolve-resource-reference-on-3.0-with-annotations-tf3919298s134.html#a11113427
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
