Hi Jacek, Thanks for your hints. To the first point: I've already seen this in the spec. I'm quite shure there is no access via the instance variables (but I will prove it again). I will also try to eliminate the entries in persistance.xml that are not neccessary. I'll tell the results as soon as possible.
Michael -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jacek Laskowski Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Juli 2007 11:19 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Problems using openJPA On 7/10/07, Ueberbach, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jacek, > > meanwhile I'm able to send the jar I deployed to geronimo. I attach it to > this mail, sources should be included. Also the persistence.xml that is used. > As you can see I put @Basic annotations to all property getters explicitly > (although I think this should be default) to make shure that access should be > done by property (and not by field). Nevertheless this seems not be > recognized by openJPA. It would be great if you have any idea why and what > should be done. Hi Michael, I've just started looking into it, but thought I'd tell you that when you use property-based access (via getters) you should not access the entity state via instance fields. You don't need to specify vendor element in the persistence.xml file. Geronimo defaults to OpenJPA. According to the spec (6.2.1.4 provider p.135): The provider element must be specified if the application is dependent upon a particular persistence provider being used. You don't need to specify class elements in Java EE env (as opposed to Java SE env). The container looks for other files unless exclude-unlisted-classes element is specified (which is not the case in your example). See if that helps out. Going to spot other (mis)uses of the spec that might cause the trouble. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
