On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > On 7/5/07, Francisco Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would Geronimo2.0 be any better regarding JUnit integration? > > I can't claim it to be any better in this regard, but it's definitely > worth to try out because of its Java EE 5 compliancy and exceptional* > m2 support.
> exceptional* == throwing lots of exceptions OR of a high quality. > Choose what suits better ;-) Sounds good. Specially the when you talk about "high quality exceptions". If there is one thing that I didn't like about Geronimo(1.2), is the lack of informative exceptions & error messages. I've tried Geronimo2.0, but then there are new errors, and I still haven't had the time to look at it. (I'll probably send another mail ot the list about these later today.) > How do you run the unit tests? What properties do you specify on the > command line/to junit testcase? I'm running the tests from Ant, using a reworked version of JunitEJB (project on sourceforge, last released Jar is from 2001). The problem I had was indeed the lack of passing System.getProperties() when initializing the context. It is solved now. Cheers, -- Francisco Borges
