Hi again James, Sorry for the delay but I've been trying to fully understand what you're trying to accomplish. Have you considered using the shared lib support that is already provided by the Geronimo plugin publish/deploy functionality ?? If I correctly understand what you're trying to accomplish the shared lib support should work for you. It's not obvious to me though why you are so adverse to using the built-in publish/deploy capabilities of the plugin. Finally, have you considered upgrading to the latest versions of Geronimo and the plugin ?? Geronimo 2.0 is currently being voted on for release, and the plugin will be voted on for release shortly thereafter. Just curious. Thanks much....

James Ervin wrote:
Tim,
Thanks for the reply. Reviewing the plugins installed it looks as though the plugin is at version 1.0.0 with the org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v1 plugin at version 1.0.1. Hmm I don't see a feature. I am not quite sure the version of geronimo. It comes bundled and is installed by a script so I am not entirely sure of the version. My educated guess is that it is at version 1.2. The version of WTP is 1.5.x. Its not straightforward to offer a sample app, since I can't really offer up my plugin, so I will describe it. When you add a project dependency for a web app, I noticed that the Geronimo Eclipse plugin will generate a jar file in the ${GERONIMO_HOME}/shared/lib directory with the name ${PROJECT_NAME}.eclipse.jar. In that jar there is a manifest that is pointing at the java source output directories for the web app project and the output directories for any project dependencies. It would be nice to customize that, but that is just fine for now. The shared/lib directory is also where I generate a jar file that contains a manifest describing the set of shared libraries that all deployed web apps will share. If I add a classpath entry directly in the .classpath file for a library jar dependency, it will show in the ${PROJECT_NAME}.eclipse.jar just fine. The problem comes in that I want to use a classpath container to resolve library dependencies and not have to manage entries directly in the .classpath file. Even when the container resolves down to a set of flat jar files, it does not matter. It seems that the plugin does not check the resolved classpath of a java project and only checks the raw classpath. Shouldn't it construct the classpath by checking all project dependencies and by using the resolved, and not raw, classpath?

I am faced with a significant rewrite right now if I cannot figure out a solution, any help would be really appreciated.

Thanks,
James

On 8/7/07, * Tim McConnell* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Hi James, which version of Geronimo and the Geronimo plugin are you
    using ??
    Also, do you have an example test app that you could attach that
    demonstrates
    the failure ??

    James Ervin wrote:
     > Hello,
     > I am a developer working on an Eclipse plugin attempting to use
    WTP to
     > help ppl write Service Based web apps.  Why am I asking a question on
     > the geronimo user group?  Well because I am attempting to use Apache
     > Geronimo as the primary J2EE container.
     >
     > My problem is this, I need to be able to deploy libraries (yes I
    know
     > about the PublishOperation and that I can generate a jar with a big
     > manifest file enumerating all shared libraries) that are only used by
     > one particular web app or dependent web app.  So I have a classpath
     > container, the trouble is that the Apache Geronimo plugin that I have
     > access to does not seem to care about entries in classpath
    containers,
     > only those that are directly enumerated in a .classpath file (bad
    form
     > IMHO).
     >
     > I have attempted to deploy libs into WebContent/WEB-INF/lib, but on
     > windows WTP ( or some plugin ) keeps the bloody file lock and
    will not
     > let me update or delete it.  I even attempted to deploy the libs
    to a
     > separate directory and then told WTP via a <wb-resource/> tag in
    the WST
     > common component configuration file where to find it.  The lib
    showed up
     > in the list of WebApp Libraries, but then when deployed to
    Geronimo it
     > was not recognized.
     >
     > I have tried this and a few other combinations.  The only one
    that has
     > worked is if I create a new shared lib entry jar (bad form since
    not all
     > web apps on the container will want the given set of libraries)
    or if I
     > enumerate the libraries one by one directly in the .classpath
    (classpath
     > containers anyone?).
     >
     > Is there anyway to make the plugin respect the classpath
    container?  Or
     > at least give me a clue through the bloody EMF wilderness as to
    where in
     > the plugin the deployment configuration is determined so that I can
     > consider my options (you know like a patch...)?  I am at my wits end,
     > any help would be most appreciated.
     >
     > Thanks,
     > --
     > James E. Ervin
     >
     > A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
     > butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet,
    balance
     > accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take
    orders, give
     > orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem,
     > pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight
    efficiently,
     > die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
     > -Robert A. Heinlein
     >
     > Blog: http://iacobus.blogspot.com

    --
    Thanks,
    Tim McConnell




--
James E. Ervin, IV

A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
-Robert A. Heinlein

Blog: http://iacobus.blogspot.com

--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell

Reply via email to