Hi Erik,

At the moment, I'm part way through getting our applications working on Geronimo / Websphere-CE. We basically have two applications - our core application which is used for building publications, and another app that acts as a asset management system, and integrates with our core app using JMS. The first one of the two is now up and running on a Websphere-CE server, and hasn't really taken much to get it working at all.

Largely all I needed the J2G tool to do was create some new deployment descriptors, which it did without any real problems. I needed to add some EJB refs to my geronimo-web.xml, and I needed to create a jms-resource-plan.xml myself. At first glance it didn't appear to generate much in the way of <message-driven> elements and I was a fair way through creating a patch to generate what I could from ejb-jar.xml and then I realised there was some code to do it from annotations in the source. By far and away the biggest problem I encountered was with how our EARs were laid out. I think JBoss is too forgiving with its classloader - we had a core.jar file inside our EJB.jar and nothing in any jar manifests that specified any kind of classpath. (I believe it was done in JBoss-IDE using this: http://docs.jboss.com/jbosside/tutorial/build/en/pdf/JBossIDE-Tutorial.pdf as a guide). I needed to do quite a bit of work to get it repackaged so that Websphere would be happy with it.

I now need to do the same thing with the other app - I think this will be more involved, we've used more JBoss specific classes in places, so it'll hopefully be a good test of the J2G tool in terms of its code conversion abilities. I'll let you know how I get on.

Overall I thought J2G was great (although it took ages to get it to build - it wasn't obvious that Maven was going nuts because I was using JDK1.6 - I couldn't find a binary on the web - is it worth adding a link from the cwiki pages?) The reason behind exploring the XDoclet route, is rather than 'migrating' to Geronimo, we'd like to add it to the app servers we can support. Going forward, we'd like new beans we add etc to work on both without needing to run J2G again, or editing two sets of files. But in terms of getting the apps going ont Geronimo in the first place, J2G has made the task much easier.

I'd be more than happy to contribute to the J2G project if I can.

Hope that's helpful.

Regards

Jon

Erik B. Craig wrote:
Jon,

I am one of the developers that contributed to j2g most recently, and I am wondering if you had any specific comments on it, or thoughts on any areas that you thought could use some improvement? I've been hoping someone would, like yourself, use it in a real world scenario to really give it a solid test, as the best I've been able to do are 'mock' situations in testing. Any input you could give would be great, especially if it would be something you might be interested in helping out with a bit, as well. Oh, and another quick thing, did the version you played with incorporate eclipse ui plugins and annotations support yet, or no?


Thanks!

--
Erik B. Craig

On 8/14/07, *Jonathan Gallimore* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    Hi All,

    Apologies if this has been asked before, but I was wondering
    whether anyone uses XDoclet to generate their openejb-jar.xml
    deployment descriptors?

    Currently we're developing for JBoss 4, and are part way through
    getting our app to deploy on the community edition of Websphere.
    The J2G migration tool has done an excellent job of migrating our
    deployment descriptors, but going forward I'd still like to add
    all the necessary XML stuff for new EJBs using XDoclet rather than
    hand editing the openejb-jar.xml. Having hunted around it looks
    like the openejb task that comes with XDoclet is for a much older
    version, and only handles session beans.

    I've started work on an xdoclet plugin that generates a basic
    openejb-jar.xml for me, and I was just wondering whether I had
    missed an existing tool/plugin and was just duplicating work
    (obviously if I haven't and this is a useful piece of work, I'd be
    happy to continue and share it).

    I'd appreciate any thoughts anyone has.

    Regards,

    Jon




------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/955 - Release Date: 15/08/2007 16:55

Reply via email to