Hi David!

There were no errors during deployment.
Application deploys and starts. Bean does not work.

Without name attribute, everything is OK.

best regards
Ɓukasz

----- Original Message ----
From: David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, 8 September, 2007 12:44:42 AM
Subject: Re: G2.0.1 @Stateless and @Stateful name parameter ignored?


On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Xh wrote:

> Hi All!
>
> I've encountered a strange thing.
> I've noticed that all @State*(name="Name") definitions are ignored  
> by Geronimo 2.0.1.
> Application deploys successfully, but in JNDI Viewer there are no  
> session beans.
>
> Simple:
>
> @Stateless(name = "ModuleProxy")
> public class ModuleProxyBean implements ModuleProxy {
> ...
> }
>
> doesn't not work, but this:
>
> @Stateless
>  public class ModuleProxyBean implements ModuleProxy {
>  ...
>  }
>
> works.
>
> After removing name definition and redeploying application I can  
> see in JNDI Viewer my bean.
> Also, I can look it up in JNDI with this string (note the full  
> class name ModuleProxyBean):
> DataWeaver2EnterpriseProxyModule.jar/ModuleProxyBean/ 
> org.xh.dataweaver.interfaces.ejb.ModuleProxy
>
> Has somebody else experienced this? Is it normal Geronimo behaviour?
>

The 'name' attribute of @Stateless, @Stateful, and @MessageDriven is  
definitely used in the code and tested for.  Maybe there's another  
issue going on.  When you say there are no session beans in the JNDI  
Viewer, that would seem to imply a different issue such as the bean  
not getting deployed at all.


-David






        
        
                
___________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Reply via email to