On Nov 26, 2007 9:50 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not exactly. I interpreted the original message is indicating this > is what was already tried and didn't work. Instead I was suggesting > creating a new 3rd configuration that only has dependencies to create > a classloader with the needed jar that can be used as a parent > classloader for both of the web apps. Of course I may have > misinterpreted both the original post and your question :-)
I was mistaken and when I had sent the email I realized I made the mistake. Sorry for confusion. As to the user's question, you're right - a parent configuration is the solution. Where could I find sample configuration I could borrow the idea from? Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
