Are you sure, that geronimo 2.1.1 contains the fixed Version of ActiveMQ? The BuckTrackingEntry apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1215 says, the bug is fixed in Version 5.1. But Geronimo 2.1.1 contains Version 4.1.2?
Thanks! Jochen > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: "Jochen Zink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Gesendet: 04.06.08 15:11:11 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Maybe a ActiveMQ Bug? > Hello, > > thanks for your reply. > > Maybe it is possible to use geronimo 2.1.1. I must discuss this with our > development team. > > Thanks! > Regards > Jochen > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: "Kevan Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Gesendet: 04.06.08 14:18:32 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: Maybe a ActiveMQ Bug? > > > > On Jun 4, 2008, at 3:06 AM, Jochen Zink wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > We are running Geronimo 2.0.1. We are using a JMS-Queue with one > > Receiver (MDB). Sometimes we get this Exception on Geronimos stdout: > > Exception in thread "ActiveMQ Transport: tcp://localhost/127.0.0.1: > > 61616" java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0 > > at edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList. > > remove(CopyOnWriteArrayList.java:346) > > at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionPoolImpl.getExistingServerSessio > > n(ServerSessionPoolImpl.java:159) > > at org.apache.activemq.ra.ServerSessionPoolImpl.getServerSession( > > ServerSessionPoolImpl.java:114) > > at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionConsumer.dispatch(ActiveMQConn > > ectionConsumer.java:136) > > at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.onCommand(ActiveMQConnection. > > java:1479) > > at org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.onCommand( > > ResponseCorrelator.java:95) > > at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.onCommand(TransportFil > > ter.java:65) > > at org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand( > > WireFormatNegotiator.java:133) > > at org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onCommand( > > InactivityMonitor.java:122) > > at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume( > > TransportSupport.java:84) > > at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport. > > java:137) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) > > > > After this, the ActiveMQ System seems to hang. Only a restart helps. > > Is this a Bug? I found this: > > http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1246 > > > > It sounds a little bit similar. > > > > Is there any workaround known? > > > > Hi Jochen, > > Yes, it's an ActiveMQ bug. I believe it was fixed by http://issues. > > apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1215 > > > > Geronimo 2.1.1 includes the fixed version of ActiveMQ (4.1.2). Is G 2. > > 1.1 an option for you? We haven't tested AMQ 4.1.2 with G 2.0.x, > > although it should be doable... > > > > --kevan > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 30 Tage > kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220 > > ______________________________________________________________ Jeden Monat 1 hochkarätiger maxdome-Blockbuster GRATIS! Exklusiv für alle WEB.DE Nutzer. http://www.blockbuster.web.de
