Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Beniamin Mazan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please copy/paste the subject at the very least so there's anything to
> respond to. Care to negotiate? ;-)
>
> I haven't seen anybody who has tried to change OpenJPA (the default
> JPA engine in Geronimo) to Hibernate as a default JPA provider, but
> Hibernate works fine when specified in provider in persistence.xml.
> The only drawback of specyfing it in the aforementioned file
> is...well...having to specify it explicitly. Not much, but could be
> less of course. I think it'd be a good exercise to find out how much
> effort changing OpenJPA to Hibernate would require. Perhaps not an
> easy task but definitely doable.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>
>
Thanks Jacek, I'll try to use H in the way you described. I've found too
much cases of strange behaviour of OpenJPA.
-----
thanks
Beniamin
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Could-I-use-Hibernate-as-default-persistence-engine-with-Geronimo-2.1--tp18315223s134p18317334.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
