Aldian_00 wrote:
>
>
> Ok Thank you very much everyone for the reply. I would still have a tough
> question to ask you:
>
> About Geronimo's load balancing / failover capacities. Is it only based on
> apache's ones, or is there a functionality specific to Geronimo about
> this?
>
> I am asking this because it seems that apache's load balancing only bother
> of front-end aspects: severals servers with thousands of clients
> (web-browsers or desktop applications). And in our case we plan to
> developp an application of type Operations Support Systems which will be
> interfaced to an existant Network Management System, and we will need to
> use back-end type load-balancing between all our thousands of equipements.
> As for our client applications, we won't have many.
>
> So here is the question: Is Geronimo able to perform load-balancing of
> back-end type?
>
> Aldian
>
Aldian_00 wrote:
>
>
>
> Xasima Xirohata wrote:
>>
>> Sorry,
>>>> and we will need to use back-end type load-balancing
>>
>> is it on the topic of Group Communication Management System, means
>> 1) load balancing to propagate requests to the certain instance of
>> Network Management System (equipment)
>> 2) automatic determining of inclusion / exclusion certain instance
>> (equipment) to/from the group
>> 3) determining fail overs in request propagation or instance (equipment)
>> live.
>>
>> So you want to use Geronimo in scope of Clients <-> Geronimo <->
>> GROUP {equipment}, don't you?
>>
>
> Yes this is exactly what I want
>
> regards
>
> Aldian
>
Now that we know exactly what I would like, could you please answer the
original question? Thank you very much!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/your-current-Geronimo-evaluation-tp22329850s134p22537712.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
