Hi Jack,
Good suggestion and this is exactly what was implemented.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 15/05/2009, at 1:31 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
Thanks for stepping out Gianny!
I thought WADI use the "clusterNameNode" value set in var/config/
config-substitutions.properties to append to JSESSIONID, at least
for Jetty [1]. If I'm right, I suggest that we use the same setting
for Tomcat, instead of using the jvmRoute parameter which is used
by Tomcat native clustering.
-Jack
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/clustering-configuration-for-
jetty.html
2009/5/14 Gianny Damour <[email protected]>
Hi,
There are various way to fulfill session stickiness. I have been
conducting all my integration tests with HAProxy, http://haproxy.
1wt.eu/, which does not require downstream load-balanced servers to
do any manipulations to session cookies.
I created an improvement ticket, https://issues.apache.org/jira/
browse/GERONIMO-4626, to capture the need to augment returned
session cookies with jvmRoute information so that mod_jk can be
used. I also checked in against trunk some code to address this
problem. I have not yet integration tested this code change with
mod_jk; However, I am quite confident with the change.
I intend to do some integration tests over the week-end to confirm
the proper resolution of this problem. Meanwhile, if you want, you
can check-out this module:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/
tomcat/geronimo-tomcat6-clustering-wadi
build it with maven and install the resulting artifact into your
repository to give it a try.
FWIW, if you can swap your reverse-proxy or load-balancing layer
currently realised by Apache mod_jk, then I would recommend HAProxy.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 14/05/2009, at 2:02 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
With WADI, your guess is right that the clusterNodeName in config-
substitutions.properties is used to identify each node. So if this
is not working, then it's a bug. You can open a JIRA.
-Jack
2009/5/14 Dennis Cartier <[email protected]>
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Jack Cai <[email protected]>
wrote:
Tomcat native clustering and WADI are two different approaches.
To try out Tomcat native clustering, for example, please refer to
this doc [1]. It clearly points
out that you need to set the "jvmRoute" parameter (note ID) in the
config.xml.
Good luck!
-Jack
[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/tomcat-native-clustering.html
2009/5/13 Dennis Cartier <[email protected]>
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:19 PM, viola lu <[email protected]> wrote:
First, pls set up tomcat or wadi cluster following this link:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC22/clustering-and-farming.html
and then configure apache http server to realize session affinity,
if you use mod_jk way: edit works.properties under $http server
install dir/conf with
worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1
if you use mod_proxy, you can edit httpd.conf with:
ProxyPass / balancer://mycluster/ stickysession=JSESSIONID
Viola
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Dennis Cartier
<[email protected]> wrote:
I am trying to find out how to configure G2.1.4 for session
affinity when using Tomcat and WADI. Would anyone be able to point
me in the right direction?
I thought that ClusterNodeName looked like a good guess in the
config-substitutions.properties file but that does not seem to
attach a node name to the generated session.
Any help would be appreciated.
Dennis
--
viola
Thanks for the pointers Viola. I am fine with the clustering
aspects as far as Apache goes, I am just having trouble getting the
node name to be properly appended to the generated JSESSIONID.
I changed to the target namespace as indicated in the G2.2 cluster
docs (<web-app xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web/
tomcat-2.0.1">) and I already had my WAR marked distributable as
well as having the <tomcat-clustering-wadi /> element in place.
Unfortunately I still do not get a node name being appended to the
generated session so no affinity results.
I noticed the G2.2 docs had a section on switching WADI to unicast.
This sounded optional, I assume the default multicast mode of WADI
is functional and changing to unicast is not required?
I remain stumped. With no session affinity my requests are still
spraying across the entire cluster rather then being sticky to a
single node.
Dennis
Hmmm, I am getting the feeling that stick sessions (session
affinity) is not possible in WADI clustering? I am not really
wanting to switch to Tomcat native clustering at this point. Does
anyone know if WADI (as implemented in G2.1.4) supports sticky
sessions?
Dennis