Thanks Ameya for your reply..
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Ameya Vilankar <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > The problem with the above scenario since all vertices will call vote to > halt, there will be no active vertices left for the next superstep since > none of the vertices receive a message. So, the program will terminate on > zeroth superstep itself. If you want access to the output of the aggregator > you can > 1. Not call voteToHalt in the superstep 0 but call it in superstep 1 where > you get the aggregated value before calling it. > 2. Use an aggregator writer class the saves the aggregated output to file. > I don't know if Aggregator writer is present in the release branch of > giraph. But, it is surely present in its trunk branch which I suggest you > work off. > Thanks > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Jyoti Yadav > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Please help.. >> >> Jyoti >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Jyoti Yadav >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Anyone please reply.. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jyoti Yadav <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi.. >>>> I have one query in my mind..I don't know whether it is a silly >>>> question or not? >>>> But the question is >>>> >>>> Suppose the scenario mentioned below.. >>>> >>>> At Superstep 0 >>>> 1.All vertices are active. >>>> 2. All vertices write some vaue to the SumAggregator. >>>> 3. All vertices vote for halt.. >>>> The question is that Will the vertices be able to get the value of >>>> SumAggregator in >>>> next superstep? Becoz in superstep 0 no explicit msg is being passed to >>>> the neighbours.. And at the end all vertices are voting for halt.. >>>> >>>> >>>> Any suggestions are really appreciated.. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Jyoti >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
