Jyoti - I recently did a similar thing. In fact, my approach was exactly what
Maja suggested. However, there is a caveat. You can switch computation class
for workers in mastercompute's compute method but that requires the messages
sent by computation class active before switching and messages received by
computation class after switching to be the same.
For instance
Superstep 1 - Compute-A (M1)Superstep 2 - Compute-A (M1)Superstep 3 -
Compute-B(receive M1, outgoing is M2) --> you can achieve this using
AbstractComputation, instead of BasicComputation.However, if Compute-B needs to
be used in superstep-4 as well i.e.Superstep 4 - Compute-B [it receives M2 but
that conflicts with its definition]
So in this case the trick isSuperstep 1 - Compute-A (M1)Superstep 2 - Compute-A
(M1)time to switchSuperstep 3 - NoOpMessageSink extends
AbstractComputation<I,V,E,M1,M2> whose compute() = { translate M1-> M2}make the
switchSuperstep 4 - Compute-B (M2)Superstep 5 - Compute-B (M2)
and so on.
If your compute functions change alternatively then u can extend
AbstractComputation likeSuperstep 1 - Compute-A (extends AbstractComputation
<M1, M2>)Superstep 2 - Compute-B (extends AbstractComputation <M2,
M1>)Superstep 3 - Compute-A (extends AbstractComputation <M1, M2>)Superstep 4 -
Compute-B (extends AbstractComputation <M2, M1>)
@Maja, please add-to /correct what I wrote.
Thanks.
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Running one compute function after another..
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:01:08 +0000
Hi Jyoti,
A cleaner way to do this is to switch Computation class which is used in the
moment your condition is satisfied. So you can have an aggregator to check
whether the condition is met, and then in your MasterCompute you call
setComputation(SecondComputationClass.class)
when needed.
Regards,
Maja
From: Jyoti Yadav <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, January 11, 2014 10:48 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Running one compute function after another..
Hi ????? ??π???????...
I will go by this..
Thanks...
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:52 PM, ????? ??π???????
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hey,
You can have a boolean variable initially set to true(or false, whatever). Then
you divide your code based on the value of that variable with an if-else
statement. For my example, if the value is true then it goes through the first
'if'. When the condition
you want is fullfilled, change the value of the variable to false (at all
nodes) and then the second part will be executed.
Ilias
???? 11/1/2014 6:18 ??, ?/? Jyoti Yadav ??????:
Hi folks..
In my algorithm,all vertices execute one compute function upto certain
condition, when that condition is fulfilled,i want that all vertices now
execute another compute function.Is it possible??
Any ideas are highly appreciated..
Thanks
Jyoti
