2009/12/11 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>

>
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Russel Winder <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think this is an opportunity for a community based approach.
>
>
> In my experience, community based documentations always end up in a
> disaster (especially wiki based ones).  You end up trading quality for
> quantity and you lose a lot of consistency.
>
> I'd rather see a two-three page one person guide than fifty pages of
> mishmash information cobbled together without overall vision.
>
> --
> ***Cédric
> *
>
>
I think this is why Russell said "In the end every document benefits from
having a last person who writes everything...."  The idea, I think, is to
get the content from everyone and then have a single person put it together
into a cohesive whole.  This person will do the lion's share of the work,
but not having to generate all the content as well is a huge burden
removed.  With this approach, the idea is that one person would not have to
dedicate as much time which makes the whole effort more likely to happen.


-- 
John Murph
Automated Logic Research Team

Reply via email to