Hello,
I extended my GradleConfigurationClass and now I get NPE - so it looks like
things don't work that way, I thought they would ...
My Config-class is this:
-----------<snip>---------------
class SRProjectTypes {
private final String LibraryType = 'lib'
private final String ProcessType = 'process'
private final String ServiceType = 'service'
private final String ApplicationType = 'application'
private final String ThemeType = 'theme'
private final String StandaloneType = 'standalone'
def project
def targetSubDir = [
LibraryType : 'lib',
ProcessType : 'ext',
ServiceType : 'srv',
ApplicationType : 'ext',
ThemeType : 'ext',
StandaloneType : '.'
]
def srLibraries() {
project.subprojects.findAll { typeOf(it.name) == LibraryType }
}
def srProcesses() {
project.subprojects.findAll { typeOf(it.name) == ProcessType }
}
def srServices() {
project.subprojects.findAll { typeOf(it.name) == ServiceType }
}
def srApplications() {
project.subprojects.findAll { typeOf(it.name) == ApplicationType }
}
def srThemes() {
project.subprojects.findAll { typeOf(it.name) == ThemeType }
}
def srStandalones() {
project.subprojects.findAll { typeOf(it.name) == StandaloneType }
}
def typeOf(String name) {
if (name.endsWith('Process')) return ProcessType
if (name.startsWith('SRSrv')) return ServiceType
if (name.startsWith('SRApp')) return ApplicationType
if (name.startsWith('SRTheme')) return ThemeType
if (name == 'SRStarter'
|| name == 'SRJInstaller'
|| name == 'SRServiceManager') return StandaloneType
return LibraryType
}
}
-----------<snap>---------------
Later in the build script I use that class:
-----------<snip>---------------
File targetBase = ...
for (file in configurations.runtime) {
type = typeOf(file.name)
targetDir = new File(targetBase, targetSubDir[type])
...
}
-----------<snap>---------------
From the NPE I guess, that at definition of the map, the keys get not
dereferenced, so I'm asking for nonexisting keys.
How can I define the map, so that the keys of the map are the values and not
the names of the defined keys (from above)?
Is the access-pattern ok for that map, or do I have errors at both edges?
kind regards
Geronimo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
