On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Hans Dockter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Russel,
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Russel Winder
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 11:46 +0100, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote:
>> > Russel Winder <[email protected]> writes:
>> >
>> > > I don't know if anyone other than me is using Emacs to edit Gradle
>> > > files . . .
>> >
>> > Yes
>>
>> Excellent. Emacs will eventually take over the world, Eclipse's days
>> are numbered ;-)
>>
>> > > Is there a need for a Gradle mode (as a sub-mode of Groovy mode?)
>> >
>> > Would be nice
>>
>> OK, let's put it on the agenda. We have an evolving Groovy mode, there
>> is a Grails mode build on it, so having a Gradle mode makes lots of
>> sense.
>>
>> Groovy mode is developed with Bazaar, Grails mode with Git. I'd prefer
>> to do a Gradle mode with Bazaar but I guess whatever happens has to fit
>> with the overall infrastructure.
>>
>> > > or are people happy using a Groovy mode?
>> >
>> > No :-) I haven't spent a lot of time trying to configure it, but it
>> > seems
>> > like indentation doesn't really work well for me. And it gets confused
>> > (I think) about the gradle task syntax.
>>
>> I think we need a record other than email of the problems, this means
>> starting something new. Until there is a Gradle mode project and issue
>> tracker, perhaps put things on the Groovy issue tracker using the "Emacs
>> mode" component.
>>
>> I think I'd like Hans to express a view on where this should all happen.
>
> You might start it on Launchpad :) Then we see how it evolves and at one
> point merge it into the core repository.
>
> Unfortunately we don't have any Gradle sandbox infrastructure yet.
Sorry to revive an old thread, but did anything happen on a Gradle
mode or is Groovy mode still the best choice?
/Jeppe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
