Adam Murdoch <[email protected]> writes: > On 22/03/2011, at 7:24 AM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Peter Niederwieser > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Jeppe Nejsum Madsen wrote: >>>> >>>> I just upgraded from 0.9.2 to 1.0-M1 and now the test results seem > to get >>>> the package name wrong. >>>> >>> >>> Where do you see wrong package names? In the new HTML test report? >> >> Yes. All tests seems to be placed in the "default-package" package. >> Maybe it's related to the somewhat weird classnames on the testcase >> (which I don't understand either, I don't have any classes with > these >> names) >> >> It looked like 0.9.2 used the name of the testsuite to group the >> tests whereas 1.0-M1 uses the classname? > > 1.0-m1 uses the classname of the test, as reported by the test > runner. This ends up in the 'classname' attribute. 0.9.2 uses the name > of the class that was passed to junit to execute. This ends up in the > testsuite' attribute. In theory, the 1.0-m1 behaviour is the more > accurate one, though it does depend on the test runner reporting the > correct class names, which seems not to be the case here. > > Which test framework are you using to run these tests?
I'm using the specs framework http://code.google.com/p/specs/ with the JUnit support. I'm able to run the tests fine in IntelliJ using it's JUnit support. Anything I can do to further diagnose this? /Jeppe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
