realised even :-) On 14 April 2011 15:30, Glen Stampoultzis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry just released that latest points to the snapshot release so I guess > that idea wouldn't make sense. > > > On 14 April 2011 15:27, Glen Stampoultzis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Good news. I guess it will take a while for Google to catch up. >> >> Another suggestion if I may. In the documentation page [1] the "Current >> Release" section points to a specifically versioned URL [2]. It might be >> better to have that point to the "latest" url [3] and update it to the >> specific version when a newer version is released. This would help encourage >> people to link to the latest versions of the documentation and improve your >> search engine page rank. >> >> [1] http://www.gradle.org/documentation.html >> [2] >> http://www.gradle.org/1.0-milestone-2/docs/userguide/userguide_single.html >> [3] >> http://www.gradle.org/latest/docs/userguide/userguide_single.html<http://www.gradle.org/1.0-milestone-2/docs/userguide/userguide_single.html> >> >> Regards, >> >> Glen >> >> >> On 14 April 2011 14:53, Ken Sipe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> > Glen, >>> > >>> > We recently moved the gradle.org site to machines hosted by contegix. >>> At the same time, I added the robots.txt file... so.. task complete. >>> > >>> > Ken >>> > >>> > On Apr 13, 2011, at 7:00 PM, Glen Stampoultzis wrote: >>> > >>> >> One issue I constantly run into when searching for gradle information >>> is that the older version of the docs often rank higher than the newer >>> versions in Google. Have you considered adding a robots.txt to exclude >>> older versions from search engine indexes? That should mean users get the >>> most up-to-date docs when they're searching for information. >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> >>> >> Glen >>> > >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >>> >>> >> >
