On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:34 PM, Luke Daley wrote:

> 
> On 03/08/2011, at 12:20 AM, Hani Suleiman wrote:
> 
>> There are a lot of very annoying transitive dependencies that get sucked in 
>> when building against gradleApi().
>> 
>> For example, we end up with log4j-over-slf4j, which is a thin facade for 
>> log4j but does not cover the whole API. So any projects for example that try 
>> to configure log4j directly will fail to compile, even if they declare a 
>> dependency on log4j explicitly due to this extra jar being sucked in. 
>> Similarly for jcl-over-slf4j, and probably a number of other jars that 
>> should remain internal to gradle and are only required at runtime, not 
>> compile time (the commons-* army, for example).
> 
> Please raise an issue for this. When compiling against the Gradle API, 
> Gradle's runtime shouldn't be on the compile classpath.
> 
http://issues.gradle.org/browse/GRADLE-1715

> It's like it currently is due to convenience reasons, but there isn't an 
> issue in the tracker to resolve this.
> 
>> This to me is yet another argument why a provided configuration should be 
>> supported by default!
> 
> “provided” doesn't help here.
> 
> What you need is something like…
> 
> dependencies {
>       compile gradleApi()
>       runtime gradleRuntime()
> }
> 
Aha, yeah I totally forgot about the runtime dependency option.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to