On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 05:09 m99 <[email protected]> wrote: > "The issue is not the size of the patch but the reason(s) for the patch. If > the assertion is that forcing JPEG provides some security benefit, the > benefit needs to be explained." > > Forcing JPEG lossy compression on every screen image sent from guacamole > would help mitigate attempts of steganography within these images. This is > the main goal of the patch we have implemented. >
You are concerned that users within remote desktop will use steganography to hide data within images as a means of transferring that data out of the remote desktop environment? - Mike
