Hi again, I know the Guacamole devs don't want to implement a "VPN-like" web portal to access other protocols such as HTTP/HTTPS and FTP (discussed before), but I'd like to know if anyone here has any thoughts/experience regarding a guacamole-like portal such as:
https://help.fortinet.com/fmgr/50hlp/56/5-6-2/FMG-FAZ/1300_VPN_Manager/1200_SSL_VPN/0410_Pre%20defined%20bookmarks.htmPredefined bookmarks This commercial product offers basically the same features as Guacamole (except for the fact that telnet, vnc and rdp require a plug-in which I dislike) with the added support for HTTP/HTTPS and FTP services. I'm struggling to keep using open-source projects whenever possible, but not everyone is on my side :-(. I'd like to keep using Guacamole (because it simply works great), and for that I'd need to argue why. The only missing piece for me is really HTTP, and I'm wondering how this commercial product is implementing it. As previously commented in this thread, it's hard to imagine that it's implemented as "HTML to image rendering" (but possible). It may also be simply a reverse proxy setup (which could be implemented with other open-source projects), but it doesn't seem to be. Does anyone have experience with this or similar products (regarding HTTP)? I am trying to make a custom extension where I add URLs to my guacamole portal which simply point to Apache HTTPS reverse proxies. However, I'm not sure this solution competes effectively with the commercial product I've cited. Any ideas are very welcome. Vieri --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
